Why in news?
The proposed two-slab GST system is a major reform under consideration by the Indian government to simplify and rationalize the country's Goods and Services Tax (GST) structure.
 
Here are the key features and implications of this system:

• Structure: The existing four-tier GST structure (5%, 12%, 18%, 28%) will be replaced by just two primary tax slabs:

• 5% slab: Intended mainly for essential and daily-use goods.
• 18% slab: Will cover most other goods and services, essentially absorbing the current 12% and 28% categories. About 99% of items currently taxed at 12% are expected to move to 5%, and about 90% of those in the 28% slab may shift to 18%.

• Special Rates: Select items, particularly luxury and sin goods (e.g., tobacco, luxury automobiles), may attract a much higher special rate, potentially around 40%.

• Rationale and Goals:

• To simplify compliance for businesses and reduce classification disputes.
• To correct inverted duty structures, minimizing input tax credit accumulation.
• To make the system more stable and predictable, supporting industrial and economic growth.
• To reduce the GST burden on common and aspirational goods, aiming to increase affordability and stimulate consumption.
• Long-term goal to move towards a single GST slab by 2047, aligning with global best practices.

• Timing: The reforms are expected to be discussed by the GST Council in September 2025, with a rollout targeted around Diwali 2025, if consensus is reached.

• Impact: The simplified two-tier system is expected to:

• Lower tax rates for many common use items, boosting affordability and consumption.
• Help small and medium-sized businesses by reducing compliance burdens.
• Enhance predictability and ease of doing business for all sectors.

The government emphasizes that only a small set of goods (such as those currently under luxury or "sin" item categories) will see special, higher rates, while the vast majority of goods and services will fall under the two main slabs.

This proposed reform represents one of the most significant tax structure overhauls since GST was first implemented in 2017.
 
Key mechanisms to simplify the current tax classification:
 
1. Reducing the Number of Tax Rates

• The existing four-tier structure (5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%) creates ambiguity and frequent disputes over the correct classification of goods and services. The two-slab model—primarily 5% and 18%—means fewer brackets, making it easier to classify products accurately without the risk of interpretive error or manipulation.

• Special rates will only apply to a select few items, further minimizing edge cases where classification disputes usually arise.

2. Minimizing Classification Disputes

• With fewer rates, the scope for arguments over which slab a product or service belongs to is dramatically reduced. This helps prevent litigation between taxpayers and authorities on rate applicability, a common problem under the current multi-rate regime.
• The reform will also resolve many inverted duty structure issues, where input costs are taxed at higher rates than finished goods, again by consolidating slabs and providing clearer rate guidance.

3. Providing Tax Certainty and Consistency

• The simplified system provides greater rate stability and predictability for businesses and consumers, supporting long-term planning, price setting, and compliance.
• Auditors, businesses, and revenue authorities will spend far less time on classification checks and legal disputes, lowering compliance costs and freeing up resources for business growth.

 4. Global Alignment

• The two-rate GST structure brings India closer to international best practices, where most advanced economies rely on a merit rate (for essentials) and a standard rate (for general goods and services).

 5. Ensuring Equity

• By shifting essential and aspirational goods to lower rates and retaining a higher slab only for luxury or “sin” goods, the reform addresses both tax equity and clarity in the system.

The two-slab GST model is expected to greatly streamline classification, reduce disputes and legal battles, stabilize rates, simplify compliance, and make the entire indirect tax regime more predictable, efficient, and business-friendly in India.
 
Significant challenges:
1. Revenue Implications

• Risk of Reduced Government Revenue: Consolidating multiple slabs into just two main rates (5% and 18%) may lead to a substantial reduction in tax revenues, especially if many goods currently taxed at higher rates drop to the lower slab. Both Central and State governments rely heavily on GST revenues, and a decline could affect social and economic development programs.
• Balancing Rates: Most GST revenue is generated from the current 18% slab; shifting items from higher slabs could lower total collections, which is a concern for fiscal management.

2. Inflation and Price Impact

• Effect on Prices: Re-aligning GST rates can lead to price changes for goods and services. Some goods moving from higher to lower rates may drop in price, but others might increase, depending on placement in the new slabs. This can cause short-term inflationary pressures and adjustment pains for consumers and businesses.
• Transition Volatility: Initial months after switching to the new system could see volatility in pricing, supply chains, and compliance as businesses adapt.

3. Federal and Political Challenges

• State-Centre Disagreements: The GST Council includes both central and state government representatives, each with different priorities. Achieving consensus on rate changes—and their impact on state revenues—could be time-consuming and contentious.
• Compensation Cess: Some states rely on the compensation cess to offset GST revenue losses; removing or reducing this could provoke federal disputes.

 4. Classification Disputes

• Special Rates for Certain Goods: Even in a two-slab system, disputes may arise over which slab or special rate an item belongs to, especially for products with mixed use or new goods. Past litigation over classification (e.g., food items vs. luxury goods) may continue.

 5. Compliance and System Adjustments

• Transition Burden for Businesses: SMEs and enterprises will need to update accounting systems, IT infrastructure, and compliance processes to match new rates. This transitional adjustment could be costly and complex.
• Training and Awareness: Widespread re-training will be needed across sectors to ensure smooth adaptation, particularly in smaller businesses.

 6. Sectoral Impact (e.g., Real Estate)

• While sectors like real estate might benefit from reduced input costs, whether these savings are passed to consumers or absorbed by developers depends on market practices and pricing decisions.

 7. Risk of Informalisation

• If rates are set too high for certain categories, businesses may try to avoid taxes by moving transactions into the informal sector, undermining the goals of GST.

 While a simplified GST regime offers major benefits—such as reduced compliance, less litigation, and greater clarity—it faces critical implementation risks around revenue stability, consensus building, inflation control, legal disputes, and transition costs across India’s diverse economic landscape.

Download Pdf