Acid Attacks in India- A growing crisis and the struggle for justice
Acid attacks in India remain a severe crisis as of 2026, characterized by high pendency in courts and a significant gap between stringent laws and their ground-level implementation.
What are Acid Attacks?
An acid attack is a premeditated act of violence where corrosive substances—such as sulfuric, nitric, or hydrochloric acid—are thrown at a person with the intent to disfigure, maim, or kill them. Often described as "torture in a bottle," these attacks are frequently aimed at the face to cause permanent social and physical damage.
Current Statistics & Trends (2026 Updates)
- Rising Reported Cases: According to the latest National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data published in late 2025, India reported 207 acid attacks and 65 attempts in 2023.
- Abysmal Conviction Rates: In 2023, out of 703 cases pending in courts, there were only 16 convictions compared to 27 acquittals.
- Worst-Affected States: West Bengal consistently reports the highest number of cases, followed by Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. High incidence is often linked to the easy availability of acid in industrial regions.
- Massive Underreporting: While official figures show a few hundred cases, the Acid Survivors Trust International (ASTI) estimates approximately 1,000 attacks annually due to social stigma and fear of retaliation.
Geographical Hotspots
The prevalence is highly concentrated in specific regions where industrial acid is more easily accessible:
- West Bengal: Consistently reports the highest number of cases, accounting for approximately 27.5% of national incidents (57 cases in 2023).
- Uttar Pradesh: Ranked second with 31 cases in 2023.
- Other Affected States: Significant numbers are also reported in Gujarat (15 cases), Madhya Pradesh, and the national capital territory of Delhi.
What are the legal framework and judicial challenges?
Legal Framework
- Constitutional Supremacy: The Constitution of India provides the ultimate legal foundation, enshrining fundamental rights and the Rule of Law.
- Judicial Review: Under Articles 13, 32, and 226, the judiciary possesses the power of Judicial Review to strike down legislative or executive actions that violate constitutional principles or the "Basic Structure" doctrine.
- Statutory Foundation: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita of 2023 – Acid attacks are punishable by a minimum of ten years to life imprisonment and a fine to cover the victim’s medical expenses.
- The law also mandates that all hospitals provide free medical treatment to acid attack survivors, and the sale of acid must be regulated by requiring photo identification for buyers and maintaining records by sellers.
- Public Interest Litigation (PIL): A unique judicial innovation that allows the court to relax locus standi rules, enabling third parties to seek justice for marginalized groups.
Judicial Challenges
- Massive Case Backlog: As of recent 2025/2026 data, over 47 million cases are pending across various levels of the judiciary, leading to chronic delays where "justice delayed is justice denied".
- Human Resource Deficits: Chronic understaffing persists, with vacancy rates in High Courts often reaching 30% and a judge-to-population ratio of only 10.5–11 per million people (well below the recommended 50).
- Infrastructure and Technology Gaps: Many lower courts lack basic facilities like clean water or digitised records, despite the e-Courts Project aiming to modernize the system.
- Transparency in Appointments: The Collegium System (where judges appoint judges) is frequently criticized for being opaque, leading to allegations of nepotism and a lack of accountability.
- Socio-Economic Barriers: High costs of litigation, complex legal jargon, and geographical distance from higher courts effectively bar the poor and marginalized from accessing justice.
- Over-reliance on Adjournments: Frequent and often frivolous adjournments by lawyers exploit procedural loopholes, further stalling the trial process.
What are the steps needed to combat acid attacks and support survivors?
Combating acid attacks and supporting survivors requires immediate first aid, stringent legal enforcement, and comprehensive long-term rehabilitation.
Immediate First Aid Actions
Time is critical for minimizing irreversible damage:
- Call emergency services immediately.
- Flood the area with water: Flush the burn with large amounts of clean, running water (not dirty or stagnant) for at least 20–60 minutes. If acid is in the eye, rinse it continuously while holding the eyelid open.
- Remove contaminated items: Carefully cut or pull away clothing and jewelry that has touched the acid, ensuring you do not touch the substance yourself.
- Do NOT apply ointments: Avoid putting creams, oils, or toothpaste on the burn, as these can trap heat and complicate medical treatment.
Preventive and Legal Measures
As of 2026, experts emphasize systemic changes to prevent these crimes:
- Strict Regulation of Acid Sales: Governments must strictly enforce laws requiring photo ID for buyers and a mandatory transaction log for sellers. Models like Bangladesh's, which include sealing illegal shops within 30 days, have drastically reduced attack rates.
- Harsher Penalties and Fast-Track Courts: Under 2026 legal standards like the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), acid attacks carry a minimum of 10 years to life imprisonment. Establishing fast-track courts is essential to prevent the 10–15 year trial delays often faced by survivors.
- Administrative Accountability: Local authorities (such as Sub-Divisional Magistrates) should be held accountable for failing to monitor unregulated acid sales.
Survivor Support and Rehabilitation
Holistic recovery goes beyond initial medical care:
- Financial Compensation: In India, survivors are legally entitled to a minimum of βΉ3 lakh, with βΉ1 lakh typically disbursed within 15 days for immediate treatment.
- Free Medical Treatment: By law, all public and private hospitals must provide free emergency care and subsequent reconstructive surgeries to survivors.
- Long-Term Rehabilitation: Support must include lifelong access to psychological counseling, vocational training, and employment assistance to ensure social reintegration.
- Disability Rights: Some jurisdictions now recognize acid attack survivors under disability acts (e.g., RPwD Act, 2016), granting access to government job quotas and educational reservations.
Conclusion
The trajectory of acid attack jurisprudence in India reveals a striking pattern. Courts have articulated robust constitutional principles, legislatures have codified them into law, and yet survivors continue to face delay, neglect, and regulatory failure. The problem today is not doctrinal uncertainty but institutional inertia.
Without administrative accountability, procedural reform, and sustained investment in survivor rehabilitation, even the most progressive jurisprudence risks becoming symbolic. Acid attack law in India now stands at an inflection point: its future efficacy will depend not on further judicial creativity, but on whether the State finally honours the constitutional commitments already laid down by the courts.
Download Pdf