China’s Dual Posture in Early 2026

1. Domestic Challenges

• Economic slowdown: China continues to wrestle with structural issues such as debt, demographic decline, and sluggish growth.
• Political tightening: The leadership has intensified control over dissent, media, and civil society, reflecting insecurity despite outward confidence.
• Anxiety vs. assertiveness: Until late 2024, Chinese elites expressed concern about U.S. containment. By mid-2025, however, Beijing’s strategic community regained momentum, sometimes bordering on hubris.

2. Strategic Confidence Abroad

• Diplomatic expansion: China is actively building influence in multilateral institutions and strengthening ties with the Global South.
• Military posture: Assertiveness in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait continues, though calibrated to avoid direct confrontation.
• Global narrative: Beijing projects itself as a stabilizing force against Western “instability,” positioning its governance model as resilient.

• Recalibrated Competition: Following a late 2025 meeting in Busan, China and the U.S. reached transactional de-escalations, including modest tariff adjustments and eased export controls.
• Tactical Advantage: Beijing views its handling of trade disputes in 2025 as a success, securing tactical wins despite U.S. "America First" policies that shifted focus toward the Western Hemisphere and away from the Indo-Pacific.
• G2 Perception: A "G2 shadow" has emerged—a perception of tacit coordination between Washington and Beijing that constrains the strategic choices of other nations, including India.
• Persistent Rivalry: Despite tactical stability, the U.S. National Security Strategy 2025 frames China as a primary economic competitor. Clashes over U.S. interventions (e.g., in Venezuela) and continued tech sanctions ensure the strategic rivalry remains intact. 

• Strategic Imperative: Beijing views the stability of the Russian state as vital. Chinese officials have explicitly stated they "cannot afford for Russia to lose the war in Ukraine," fearing that a Russian defeat would allow the U.S. to refocus its full strategic weight on China in the Indo-Pacific.
• Asymmetric Partnership: While the partnership is "rock-solid," it is highly imbalanced; Russia relies on China as its most important trading partner, whereas Russia accounts for only about 4% of China's total foreign trade as of early 2026.
• Military Coordination: The two nations continue to deepen military ties through joint exercises in the Sea of Japan and the Arctic, aimed at countering U.S.-led alliances like the U.S.-Japan-South Korea trilateral. 

• Deflationary Environment: Producer prices have remained in negative territory for 38 consecutive months as of early 2026, signaling deep-seated overcapacity and weak demand.
• Real Estate Crisis: The property sector continues to be a primary drag; residential building investment fell by nearly 14% in late 2025, with stabilization unlikely before 2027.
• Fiscal Constraints: Local governments face extreme fiscal stress, which has severely limited their ability to implement traditional infrastructure-based stimulus. 

• New Quality Productive Forces: Beijing is doubling down on state-led development of "frontier" sectors—including semiconductors, AI, green energy, and quantum technology—to decouple from Western technological dependencies.
• Supply Chain Insulation: The new plan emphasizes "whole-chain breakthroughs" to reduce exposure to external shocks and sanctions, effectively prioritizing economic security as much as prosperity.
• Dual Circulation: While aiming for high-level opening up, the focus is on a "dual circulation" model where the domestic economy serves as the primary engine, though consumption remains a "weak link" due to low household confidence. 

• Record Trade Surplus: Driven by advanced manufacturing (EVs, batteries, and solar panels), China’s trade surplus reached a historic $1.08 trillion in the first 11 months of 2025.
• Global Backlash: This "China Shock 2.0" has intensified trade tensions with the US, EU, and emerging economies like India and Turkey, who have responded with new tariffs and anti-dumping measures. 

• Expansion of National Security: Domestically, the scope of "national security" has expanded to encompass nearly every aspect of governance, from data control and ideology to food and energy security.
• Reinforced Ideological Discipline: Political consolidation in 2025-2026 has seen a tightening of information control and intensified ideological training within the Communist Party of China (CPC).
• "Self-Revolution" and Purges: Xi has doubled down on anti-corruption efforts as a tool for political loyalty, continuing the "self-revolution" campaign into 2026 "without pause". While the purging of senior military officers in 2025 exposed internal dysfunctions, it served to further cement Xi’s personal control over the party-state.
• The 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030): The launch of this plan marks a shift toward "New Quality Productive Forces," prioritizing technological autonomy and self-reliance as the primary defense against external volatility. 

• Intensified Training and Drills: 2026 opened with massive, combat-oriented drills across all branches—Army, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force—emphasizing rapid-response capabilities and multi-domain coordination.
• Salami Slicing and Grey-Zone Tactics: China continues to use "grey-zone" tactics—actions that remain below the threshold of open conflict—to incrementally expand its presence in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with India.
• Stance on Taiwan: In his 2026 New Year address, Xi Jinping reiterated that reunification with Taiwan is an "unstoppable" historical trend. Military activities around Taiwan, including regular air and sea incursions, have reached new levels of intensity.
• Military-Civil Fusion (MCF): The 15th Five-Year Plan systematically institutionalizes MCF as the primary mechanism for defense modernization, directly integrating civilian AI and semiconductor advancements into military capabilities. 

• A more confident Beijing may feel less pressured to reassure New Delhi or make concessions on contentious issues. 
• Simultaneously, China’s caution suggests it is unlikely to pursue major escalation with India, favoring controlled competition
• Beijing may interpret its relative economic size and manufacturing might as leverage in bilateral negotiations, especially on trade or technology issues. 
• India must remain alert to economic coercion or pressure tactics, particularly in tech and supply chains where China remains strong
• A tactical U.S.–China accommodation (“G2”) risks sidelining India’s strategic interests, reducing New Delhi’s leverage in broader Indo-Pacific alignments.
• India’s strategic space could narrow if Washington prioritizes transactional deals with Beijing over deeper cooperation with New Delhi.
• India must maintain enhanced vigilance without escalating tensions, balancing deterrence with restraint.
• Long-term resolution of border disputes remains uncertain, requiring sustained diplomatic engagement.

• Strategic Patience: Manage immediate risks while pacing long-term goals.
• Asymmetric Deterrence: Invest in niche military and technological capabilities rather than seeking parity.
• Internal Strength: Focus on technological self-reliance and industrial competitiveness.
• Calibrated Engagement: Maintain diplomatic channels while guarding strategic interests.

Download Pdf