Consider Teesta water deal under current circumstances: Bangladesh
Introduction
The Teesta river dispute remains one of the most sensitive unresolved issues between India and Bangladesh. Despite otherwise strong bilateral relations, the absence of a formal agreement on Teesta water sharing continues to create periodic diplomatic friction. In the current geopolitical and domestic political context, the issue has regained urgency.
About the Teesta River
- Originates from the Eastern Himalayas (Sikkim) and flows through West Bengal before entering Bangladesh.
- It is a major tributary of the Brahmaputra River.
- Crucial for irrigation in:
- North Bengal (India)
- Rangpur region (Bangladesh)
Background of the Dispute
- India and Bangladesh began negotiations in the 1980s.
- A draft agreement in 2011 proposed:
- India: ~42.5%
- Bangladesh: ~37.5%
- However, the deal was not signed due to opposition from West Bengal, citing concerns over water availability.
Current Context (Why in News?)
- Renewed Diplomatic Engagement
- Bangladesh has repeatedly raised the issue with India.
- Water sharing remains a key demand from Bangladesh.
- Strategic Competition in the Region
- Increasing presence of China in Bangladesh (infrastructure, river projects).
- Teesta project financing offers by China raise concerns for India.
- Climate Change Pressures
- Erratic monsoon, glacier retreat, and reduced lean-season flow.
- Rising water stress makes sharing more contentious.
- Domestic Political Constraints
- Strong federal structure: states play a key role in river water agreements.
- West Bengal’s concerns remain unresolved.
Significance of Teesta Deal
1. Strategic Importance
- Bangladesh is central to India’s Neighbourhood First Policy.
- A successful deal strengthens India’s credibility as a regional partner.
2. Security Dimension
- Strong ties help counter external influence (especially China).
- Stability in border regions.
3. Economic Integration
- Bangladesh is a major trade partner.
- Connectivity projects (BBIN corridor) depend on trust.
4. Humanitarian Aspect
- Farmers in Bangladesh face severe water shortages during dry seasons.
Challenges
1. Federal Constraints
- Water is a State subject in India.
- West Bengal fears adverse effects on agriculture.
2. Seasonal Variability
- Teesta has high flow variability:
- Floods during monsoon
- Scarcity in dry months
3. Lack of Basin-Wide Approach
- No integrated river basin management system.
4. Political Sensitivity
- Issue easily politicized in both countries.
Opportunities
1. Technical Solutions
- Joint river basin management
- Data sharing on water flow
- Building reservoirs and storage systems
2. Diplomatic Innovation
- Interim agreements during lean season
- Benefit-sharing rather than strict water division
3. Sub-national Diplomacy
- Centre–State coordination
- Inclusion of West Bengal in negotiations
Way Forward
1. Cooperative Federalism
- Engage West Bengal through incentives and consultations.
- Ensure state concerns are addressed.
2. Integrated River Basin Management
- Move beyond volumetric sharing to holistic planning.
3. Climate-Resilient Framework
- Incorporate climate change projections into agreements.
4. Strengthening Bilateral Mechanisms
- Revive Joint Rivers Commission.
- Increase frequency of dialogue.
5. Strategic Balancing
- Address Bangladesh’s concerns to reduce space for external actors like China.
Conclusion
The Teesta water dispute is not merely about water sharing—it is a litmus test of India’s ability to balance domestic federal constraints with strategic foreign policy goals. A pragmatic, cooperative, and forward-looking agreement can transform Teesta from a source of discord into a pillar of India–Bangladesh partnership.
Download Pdf
