Stricter Laws Against Online Pornography Needed, Say Activists
The demand for stricter regulation of online pornography has revived an important debate on child protection, platform accountability and digital governance. Activists argue that minors must be prevented from accessing sexually explicit content, but any new law should balance public morality and child safety with privacy, free speech and technological feasibility.
Context
At a recent press conference, the Save Culture Save Bharat Foundation demanded stronger laws to regulate online pornographic and obscene content. The proposals included:
Context
At a recent press conference, the Save Culture Save Bharat Foundation demanded stronger laws to regulate online pornographic and obscene content. The proposals included:
- A legal ban on access to pornographic content by persons below 18 years.
- Mandatory and reliable age verification by digital platforms.
- Legal accountability for internet service providers and online intermediaries.
- Use of artificial intelligence to detect and restrict obscene content.
- Amendments to the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, with stricter penalties.
- Greater restrictions on minors’ access to social media and age-inappropriate digital content.
The debate has emerged amid public concern over sexual violence, exploitation of children and the circulation of non-consensual intimate material online.
Existing Legal Framework
India already has several provisions dealing with online sexual and obscene content:
Existing Legal Framework
India already has several provisions dealing with online sexual and obscene content:
- The Information Technology Act, 2000 penalises the publication or transmission of obscene material and sexually explicit material in electronic form.
- It provides stronger punishment for material depicting children in sexually explicit acts.
- The Information Technology Rules, 2021 require intermediaries to exercise due diligence and remove certain forms of intimate or sexually explicit content within 24 hours of receiving a complaint.
- OTT platforms are required to classify adult content, restrict children’s access and implement age-verification mechanisms.
- The National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre provide mechanisms for reporting cybercrimes, including offences against children.
Thus, the principal problem is not merely the absence of laws but also weak enforcement, fragmented institutional responsibility and the ease with which users can bypass existing safeguards.
Why Stronger Regulation Is Needed
1. Protection of children
Early exposure to explicit and violent sexual content may distort children’s understanding of consent, intimacy, gender relations and healthy behaviour. Age verification and parental-control systems can help reduce such exposure.
2. Tackling illegal content
Online platforms are frequently used for the circulation of child sexual abuse material, revenge pornography, deepfakes and non-consensual intimate images. Such content causes severe and continuing harm to victims because it can be copied and redistributed indefinitely.
3. Platform accountability
Digital platforms often rely on automated moderation and user complaints. Delayed removal, inadequate grievance redressal and unclear responsibility allow harmful content to remain accessible. Clear duties and penalties can make platforms more responsive.
4. Gender justice
Some online content normalises sexual violence, humiliation and misogyny. Regulation can help prevent the commercial circulation of content involving coercion, exploitation or abuse.
5. Changing digital environment
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence has made the creation of realistic sexual deepfakes easier. Existing legal provisions need to clearly address the creation, possession, publication and distribution of such material.
Major Concerns
Causal link with rape is not established
Activists have argued that easy access to pornography contributes to sexual violence. However, rape is a complex crime influenced by patriarchy, impunity, poor sex education, substance abuse, social conditioning and failures in policing and justice delivery. The recent discussion itself acknowledged that the relationship between pornography and sexual violence requires further investigation.
Therefore, pornography regulation cannot become a substitute for gender sensitisation, effective investigation and speedy trials.
Feasibility of ISP-level censorship
Making internet service providers responsible for identifying all obscene content is technologically and legally problematic. ISPs generally transmit data without knowing the precise content accessed by users. Content inspection may require breaking encryption, threatening privacy and cybersecurity.
Experts have warned that AI-based ISP-level blocking could result in overblocking entire websites or domains, including legitimate content hosted on the same services. It may also create risks of mass surveillance and arbitrary censorship.
Privacy concerns in age verification
Mandatory age verification may require users to submit identity documents, biometric information or other personal data. If such data is stored insecurely, it could lead to profiling, identity theft and surveillance.
The better approach would be privacy-preserving verification, where platforms confirm that a user is above the required age without learning or retaining unnecessary personal details.
Risk of overbroad definitions
Terms such as “obscene” and “indecent” must be precisely defined. Overbroad provisions could affect:
Why Stronger Regulation Is Needed
1. Protection of children
Early exposure to explicit and violent sexual content may distort children’s understanding of consent, intimacy, gender relations and healthy behaviour. Age verification and parental-control systems can help reduce such exposure.
2. Tackling illegal content
Online platforms are frequently used for the circulation of child sexual abuse material, revenge pornography, deepfakes and non-consensual intimate images. Such content causes severe and continuing harm to victims because it can be copied and redistributed indefinitely.
3. Platform accountability
Digital platforms often rely on automated moderation and user complaints. Delayed removal, inadequate grievance redressal and unclear responsibility allow harmful content to remain accessible. Clear duties and penalties can make platforms more responsive.
4. Gender justice
Some online content normalises sexual violence, humiliation and misogyny. Regulation can help prevent the commercial circulation of content involving coercion, exploitation or abuse.
5. Changing digital environment
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence has made the creation of realistic sexual deepfakes easier. Existing legal provisions need to clearly address the creation, possession, publication and distribution of such material.
Major Concerns
Causal link with rape is not established
Activists have argued that easy access to pornography contributes to sexual violence. However, rape is a complex crime influenced by patriarchy, impunity, poor sex education, substance abuse, social conditioning and failures in policing and justice delivery. The recent discussion itself acknowledged that the relationship between pornography and sexual violence requires further investigation.
Therefore, pornography regulation cannot become a substitute for gender sensitisation, effective investigation and speedy trials.
Feasibility of ISP-level censorship
Making internet service providers responsible for identifying all obscene content is technologically and legally problematic. ISPs generally transmit data without knowing the precise content accessed by users. Content inspection may require breaking encryption, threatening privacy and cybersecurity.
Experts have warned that AI-based ISP-level blocking could result in overblocking entire websites or domains, including legitimate content hosted on the same services. It may also create risks of mass surveillance and arbitrary censorship.
Privacy concerns in age verification
Mandatory age verification may require users to submit identity documents, biometric information or other personal data. If such data is stored insecurely, it could lead to profiling, identity theft and surveillance.
The better approach would be privacy-preserving verification, where platforms confirm that a user is above the required age without learning or retaining unnecessary personal details.
Risk of overbroad definitions
Terms such as “obscene” and “indecent” must be precisely defined. Overbroad provisions could affect:
- Sex education and reproductive-health information.
- Artistic and literary expression.
- Medical content.
- Discussions on sexual minorities and gender identity.
- Investigative journalism and victim-support resources.
A law aimed at protecting children should not unintentionally suppress lawful adult expression or access to health information.
Enforcement challenges
Pornographic websites can operate from foreign jurisdictions, use mirror sites, virtual private networks and encrypted channels. Website blocking alone may push users towards less regulated platforms and underground networks.
Way Forward
1. Focus on illegal and harmful content
The priority should be the prevention of child sexual abuse material, non-consensual intimate imagery, sexual deepfakes, trafficking-related content and material depicting coercive or violent sexual abuse.
2. Make platforms responsible
Platforms should be required to:
Enforcement challenges
Pornographic websites can operate from foreign jurisdictions, use mirror sites, virtual private networks and encrypted channels. Website blocking alone may push users towards less regulated platforms and underground networks.
Way Forward
1. Focus on illegal and harmful content
The priority should be the prevention of child sexual abuse material, non-consensual intimate imagery, sexual deepfakes, trafficking-related content and material depicting coercive or violent sexual abuse.
2. Make platforms responsible
Platforms should be required to:
- Conduct meaningful age assurance.
- Remove illegal content rapidly.
- Preserve evidence for investigation.
- Provide accessible grievance mechanisms.
- Publish transparency reports.
- Prevent repeat uploads of already-identified illegal material.
Responsibility should be proportionate to the role and capacity of each actor rather than imposed identically on platforms, hosting providers and ISPs.
3. Develop privacy-preserving age assurance
Age verification should avoid unnecessary collection of identity data. Independent audits, data minimisation, encryption and strict deletion rules should be made mandatory.
4. Strengthen institutional capacity
India needs more cyber-forensic laboratories, trained investigators, specialised prosecutors and child-friendly judicial procedures. The existing cybercrime reporting infrastructure must become faster and more accessible.
5. Promote digital and sex education
Children should receive age-appropriate education on consent, bodily autonomy, online safety, respect and responsible digital behaviour. Parents and teachers also require guidance on identifying grooming, exploitation and cyber abuse.
6. Ensure judicial oversight
Blocking orders and content-removal directions should be transparent, reviewable and subject to independent oversight. Victims must have effective remedies against unlawful circulation of intimate content.
7. Undertake evidence-based policymaking
The government should commission independent research on the relationship between online pornography, children’s behaviour, sexual violence and gender attitudes. Policy should be based on evidence rather than moral panic or isolated incidents.
Conclusion
Stricter laws are justified where they protect children and punish exploitation, abuse and non-consensual sexual content. However, a blanket ban or indiscriminate ISP-level surveillance would be difficult to enforce and could undermine privacy, encryption and legitimate expression.
India needs a rights-respecting digital safety framework based on meaningful age assurance, platform accountability, rapid removal of illegal content, stronger cybercrime investigation and comprehensive education. The objective should be not merely to censor the internet, but to make it safer, more accountable and more protective of children and vulnerable persons.
Download Pdf
3. Develop privacy-preserving age assurance
Age verification should avoid unnecessary collection of identity data. Independent audits, data minimisation, encryption and strict deletion rules should be made mandatory.
4. Strengthen institutional capacity
India needs more cyber-forensic laboratories, trained investigators, specialised prosecutors and child-friendly judicial procedures. The existing cybercrime reporting infrastructure must become faster and more accessible.
5. Promote digital and sex education
Children should receive age-appropriate education on consent, bodily autonomy, online safety, respect and responsible digital behaviour. Parents and teachers also require guidance on identifying grooming, exploitation and cyber abuse.
6. Ensure judicial oversight
Blocking orders and content-removal directions should be transparent, reviewable and subject to independent oversight. Victims must have effective remedies against unlawful circulation of intimate content.
7. Undertake evidence-based policymaking
The government should commission independent research on the relationship between online pornography, children’s behaviour, sexual violence and gender attitudes. Policy should be based on evidence rather than moral panic or isolated incidents.
Conclusion
Stricter laws are justified where they protect children and punish exploitation, abuse and non-consensual sexual content. However, a blanket ban or indiscriminate ISP-level surveillance would be difficult to enforce and could undermine privacy, encryption and legitimate expression.
India needs a rights-respecting digital safety framework based on meaningful age assurance, platform accountability, rapid removal of illegal content, stronger cybercrime investigation and comprehensive education. The objective should be not merely to censor the internet, but to make it safer, more accountable and more protective of children and vulnerable persons.
